![]() |
|
![]() |
Which Van to Buy? |
![]() |
|
Had a look over the Chalet today.
Would I buy one in preference to an A'van; no
Why?
My own opinion, the first and major reason is leaf
springs and a solid or tube axle, this arrangement was on the model T
ford back when, then over the years cars became independent on the front
set of wheels, the rear wheels gradually went independent over the last
twenty odd years, does it matter on a van well yes, perhaps one could
argue that the safety factor on a small campervan type trailer is
not as apparent as a large caravan.
Over the years large caravans with solid type axles, no doubt poorly loaded, on being towed along the road, and one wheel hitting a bump or a pot hole, even a side wind gust, or large truck coming the other, way induced a body sway on the caravan which puts a sway on the rear of the car, with or without correction the caravan sways back on the other wheel and the sway goes the other way, poor loading, steering, wet road, speed too high for the condition of the van, it then begins to oscillate, suddenly you're going sideways down the road with a crash or a rollover now a distinct possibility. Independent suspension; same conditions as above, well what do you know, wheels go up and down, yep you guessed it, independently, but what is more important, no sway on the van, or the car, the combination stays straight and no accident or rollover.
To me, for the rest; Between the two vans basically the
same, size, construction, weight, looks, options, something's
better on one van, some other things better on the other van.
For example; inside the Chalet to get at under seat
storage lift up a cushion and the lid is a thin masonite and the wrong
sizes on the A'van it is a more substantial ply, but the Chalet has
glass side windows but the A'van has a plastic or Perspex type the wall
construction is 3 sandwich type one is aluminium/polystyrene/laminate
the other is fibreglass/polystyrene/laminate, with a lot of the
differences one could mount a substantial argument as to why one was
better than the other, but you could do it for the other side as well,
and it would basically come down to personal preferences.
I feel if the Chalet had come along first then the
people who had bought them would be saying that the Chalet was much
better than the A'van and you would have a large Chalet club trying to
stop these A'van people trying to join their club.
Specifically
The Chalet
The gas bottles and water tank are too big for most
peoples camping, they have now fixed that, you can get the
smaller sizes if you want, no pole carrier now fixed, pole carrier
fitted.
The basic Chalet, no or very little options, tare 640
kg's ATM probably with your load 850 kg's, tow ball weight range 77
to 93 kg's their specs say 85 kg's, lovely beautifully balanced light
excellent.
Add the options, extended frame, front boot, put your
load in the van, now, people being people, give them a big storage
volume like a front boot, and they will fill it whether needed or not,
but, with the options plus a big boot filled plus the rest of their load
300 kg max load total, (I am sure many people would be over their 300kg
limit) and over the stated ATM of 1155 kg's. At 1155kgs a front
boot and extended frame the towball range would have to be 115 to 137
kg's, at 125 kg's ideal but no where near their stated towball
weight of 85 kg's.
The point is no small cars and a lot of family type cars
could not take that towball weight.
The Chalet is basically off road you say, and you would
need a 4WD to tow it, no problems, no worries, she'll be right mate,
well most 4wd's could tow that with that towball weight, but you have
just removed a large section of potential customers from buying your
product out of the market. Any van and 4WD going
off road would only be a fraction of its life the rest of the time would
be on tar or certainly where a car could go. The
Chalet should have LT tyres as standard not as an option.
The reading lights are good, but in the wrong position
because, if you went to bed to read, and put a pillow under your
head, the pillow would cover the lights, if the person who designed the
van took it out on a holiday for a month there would be quite a few
changes, small ones but irritating or just plain silly, how they are.
The fantastic exhaust fan sounds and looks good, I
cannot think of when or why you would use it, and at $450 even less
reason.
The A'van
What I have just said about the Chalet, applies also to
the A'van, with the extended frame and front boot and the weights.
Perhaps the ideal independent suspension would be coil
and shock absorber type, but in using the Alko I would like to see
standard on the A'van off road Alko suspension, as I believe
it is stiffer and thicker rubber inserts, generally a beefed up
road version. Also with the A'van alloy
wheels should be standard, not an option, and for goodness sake, a
better name branded tyre than present, and certainly LT tyres for the
higher weight vans.
Both manufacturers would say we supply a legal safe
product, we are not our brothers keeper, and we have no control if the
customers overload their vans or exceed limits that we have stated quite
plainly, we cannot stop people from being people, the majority of people
would get it right and be careful and thinking about the use of our
product. Most people want the best product for the cheapest price,
everything is a compromise.
Cheers
|
|
Copyright 2002 - all rights reserved - Around
Oz www.around-oz.com
For problems, suggestions or questions regarding this web contact
webmaster@around-oz.com
Last updated:
13-May-02